For example, one is writing a book and there is one pomodoro task for each chapter but they are all in the folder called 'book'. A nice new feature would be the ability to have folders where one can organise the tasks would be great. Also, if I start the pomodoro on the computer and then I open the app on the phone the app is unresponsive. For instance if a pomodoro has been started with started on the phone it should immediately be visible in the computer (the lag at the moment is too great). Sync across devices works a little bit better now. The app keeps crashing (although less often with the last update) when using it in multiple devices. Good app that needs to get updates more often It is straightforward to use and prevents wasting time by "setting it up" every day. Another thing which would be great is to be able to select or group certain tasks for the report, as they don't all fall under the same category.Īll in all this is a great app which I love due to its simplicity, and not having to restart it every time I switch on my laptop as it is always in the toolbar. This might not be necessary for everyone but in the past I named my tasks with very vague titles which were then not that helpful in my report, and I cannot change past tasks without having to delete them and create a new one, which defeats the purpose as I also delete all my logged time (I guess one could change the name in the exported csv file but this should be relatively easy feature to add). One thing I can't seem to do is change the title or name of tasks. I also really like seeing the report over time and see what I have spent most time working on. Having a timer in the toolbar with a reminder for when the productive work period ends and starts, and the break starts and ends is really helpful. Great app for managing tasks with the Pomodoro techniqueĪn amazing simple tool to remind you to take breaks, divide your workload into tasks and set an amount of time for each task. BE FOCUSED VS PRO PRO** Sync with iOS devices requires Be Focused Pro for iOS, sold separately. * Integration with Focus Matrix requires the Pro version of Focus Matrix, sold separately. Integration with Focus Matrix to manage tasks using Eisenhower's urgent/important principle* Ability to adjust alarm and chronometer volumes Customizable frequency of the chronometer sound Global hotkeys to start or stop the timer from any app Ability to paste a task list from other apps Customize reports for fast and easy goal tracking Estimate the number of intervals required to complete a task and track the estimation error Block distracting apps and websites during work intervals Use filters by tags and due dates to keep focussed on the most important tasks Specify different timer settings for different tasks Number of intervals between long breaks.Customize the timer settings to maximize productivity: BE FOCUSED VS PRO MACUse either your iPhone, iPad or Mac – your devices always stay in sync. Create tasks, configure breaks and track your progress throughout the day, week or custom period. It’s a surprisingly effective way to retain motivation and focus. The Be Focused lets you get things done by breaking up individual tasks among discrete intervals, separated by short breaks. In some quarters it might produce an adverse reaction, being perceived as "jargon" which attempts to use impressive words to try to inflate a simple action.Staying on task seems is a real challenge for our screen-bound generation. In this case, "focused on" gives the whole sentence an air of slightly more decisive and confident action.īe a little careful of this kind of sentence, according to its intended audience. There is a subtle difference in meaning - "focused on" implies that the core market objectives are fixed and understood, while "focusing on" rather suggests that detailed targets, as well as the methods of reaching them were subject to change. Probably the most compelling reason to use "focused" is to avoid having the two continuous forms so close together, which sounds just a little off-key. But in this case you already have the continuous "evolving". But as you say, there is an implied "which were" (not "which are" the action is in the past), so this is taken care of. Since the main verb "involved producing" is firmly in the past, it might be more natural to place the subsidiary "focused" in the past, rather than the continuous "focusing". Short answer, "focusing on" would also be acceptable to native speakers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |